A short, evidence-based engagement for teams that are already publishing or measuring a site, but cannot tell which defect is blocking search, clicks, inquiries, or reliable production.
The output is a written scope memo and repair queue. It is not a traffic guarantee, link-building package, ad-management offer, or generic strategy deck.
| Area | Question | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Search route | Are impressions, titles, page intent, and internal links aligned? | CTR and page-family repair notes. |
| Measurement route | Can clicks, CTAs, forms, and outbound routes be trusted? | Event-map and missing-field list. |
| Publishing route | Do pages pass visible-copy, schema, rollback, and quality checks? | Severity-ranked defect queue. |
| Sales route | Can a useful page turn into a qualified inquiry without pressure or fake proof? | CTA and inquiry-path repair notes. |
Do not send passwords, private customer lists, payment data, or production credentials in the first email.
Use plain text only: contact@leefan.co.jp. No form, mailto link, checkout, scheduling link,
or external tracker is active on this page.
Subject example: Diagnostic Sprint scope note - [site or workflow]
Do not include passwords, private customer lists, payment data, production credentials, or non-public account exports in the first message.
Read /services for the full offer ladder, then send the scope note through /contact. The first reply is a fit check and scope memo path, not a checkout link.